James Charles Stuartbecame King of Scotland on July 24 , 1567 , at the age of 13 months , after his mother , Mary Queen of Scots , was push to renounce . Thus get the land tenure of the quaternary prospicient reign British crowned head , a Billie Jean Moffitt King for 57 years whose longevity was not matched by fondness of public judgment .

On one script , James VI and I ’s sovereignty was characterize by realism ( advocating for a single Parliament , attempting to achieve religious harmony ) , peace of mind ( broker a accord with Spain , among other thing ) , and ace ( of the Scots and English crowns ) . On the other , he was despotic ( believing in the divine right field of king ) , extravagant ( prostrate to overspending the public purse ) , and frightfully vicious ( responsible for the deaths of thousand through country - sanctioned crone hunting ) . These monarchical facets changed order in way that still reverberate today .

1. James VI and I united the “auld enemies” of England and Scotland …

The Romans ’ bankruptcy to appropriate the Caledonian tribes led to the construction ofHadrian ’s Wall . This may have kept the hoi polloi northwards of the border out , but it did n’t stopWilliam of Normandy(a.k.a . William I , “ the Conqueror ” ) from invading Scotland in 1072 , leave in a armistice . ataraxis did n’t last long , with subsequent struggle such asFalkirk(1298 ) andFlodden(1513 ) bloodily carve their way through the 100 .

It ’s therefore unsurprising that while peace may have been desired by the prison term James remove the English potty , it wasnot straight . The English freeze off political incorporation with Scotland , while Scotland favour a federative sexual union . James VI and I ’s uniting of the Crowns was significant , but it was morefigurative than literal . He declared himself “ King of Great Britain ” in 1604 , though in his lifetime the pairing was confined largely to symbolic reform ( such as thecreation of the Union Jack ) . Its implication lay in paving the way for the political union 103 years subsequently .

2. … but sowed the seeds for the English Civil War.

Despite James VI and I ’s middling noble ( and clearly personal ) intention in combine the Crowns , there ’s grounds this create religious and political tensions that led to the seventeenth C EnglishCivil Warsand the decapitation of his son and heir , Charles I.

James VI and I ’s uniting of the pennant left a vacuum in office of Scotland ’s internal figurehead . TheNational Library of Scotland states , “ the removal of the Scottish baron from his country was a major drive of the 17th - century civil wars … James ’s join gave England a royal family it mistrust and left Scotland without the key symbol of national independency . ” After moving south to lay claim the English throne , James VI and I only   come back to Scotland once , becoming increasingly out of sense of touch with the body politic of his birth . Moreover , the Scots were not fond of the shared power they inherited in Charles I. Like his father , Charles did not likeruling overtwo different spiritual structures . When he attempt to force his own petition Christian Bible on the Kirk ( Church of Scotland ) , it go toriots throughout Edinburgh , contributing to mounting tensions between the nations that would finally ignite into warfare .

James VI and I had styled himself as a “ peacemaker , ” but the hope for increase spiritual tolerance during his reign did not materialize . While the serenity he broker with Spain fetch an end to 15 years of expensive wars and enmity , it disappointed Protestants who incriminate James VI and I ( a Protestant himself ) of submitting to “ popery . ”   On the other hand , Catholics hop James VI and I — whose mother , Mary Queen of Scots , and wife , Anne of Denmark , were both Catholic — would let them to openly idolize . But James VI and I lose understanding for their cause after face up downnumerous Catholic plotsagainst him .

King James VI and I.

James VI and I also experience several political partitioning with Parliament that foreshadowed Charles I ’s fundamental interaction . James VI and I was a worshipper in absolutism and theDivine rightfulness of Kings , something he defined inThe True Law of Free Monarchiesas the monarch not being capable to any earthly authorisation . He flaunted lavish personal disbursal that his Secretary of State , Robert Cecil , sought to control . Charles I inherit his father’sabsolutism and patronage for Parliament , thaw it for years at a clock time unless it was in his own interests , factor that at once head to the Civil War and his own execution .

3. James VI and I ushered in peace by ending the Anglo-Spanish wars …

The latter part ofElizabeth I ’s reign had been marked by difference of opinion with Spain . Despite the English ’s succeeder over theArmada , ongoing Anglo - Spanish conflict between Elizabeth I andPhilip IImeant that at the time of Elizabeth ’s death , England hadaccrued bombastic debtsand the government wasnearly bankrupt . When James VI and I ascended the English throne five years after Phillip II ’s death , both he and Phillip III were discriminating for peace . They signal theTreaty of Londonat Somerset House in 1604 , usher in 50 years of stability between the erstwhile foes .

4. … but diminished the prosperity of merchants and privateers.

While James VI and I ’s peacefulness with Spain wascelebrated in some quarters , others found it less lucky . The war had been beneficial for some merchandiser , who became loaded throughprivateeringwith Portuguese and Spanish ships in the southern Atlantic . InElizabethan Privateering , K. R. Andrews describes how the activity was the “ main form of English nautical war ” at the clip , and was “ closely connected with patronage . ” Elizabeth I grantedprivateers — or Sea Dogs — such as Sir Francis Drake and Sir Walter Raleigh certify to attack Spanish ships . The wealth the merchandiser backing the privateer accrued was a boost for England ’s prosperity . As onehistorian note , “ the Elizabethan war with Spain … [ reorientated ] the English saving to the global stage . ”

5. James VI and I was responsible for the torture and death of thousands accused of witchcraft.

The ScottishWitchcraft Act of 1563had made capital offence of practicing witchery and consulting with witches , but the fervor associated with the witch huntsdidn’t startuntil long after James VI and I came to the throne . As Allan Kennedy write inThe Trial of Isobel Duff for Witchcraft , Inverness , 1662 , “ [ witchcraft ] prosecutions were rare until the 1590s , when the first ‘ panic ’ adopt place . ”

Some wild weather is partly at fault . While sail back to Scotland after their wedding , James and Anne passed through grievous storms that nearly wrack them . The incrimination was placed on witches , with some womenconfessing under torturethat they had used witchery on the royals ’ ship .

The sweeping persecution of those suspected of witchcraft began , starting with theNorth Berwick witch trialsof 1590–1591 . The accurate number is not known , but it ’s conceive between 70 and 200 people were accused of witchcraft during that period , with many excruciate and/or carry out .

The execution of King Charles I.

Further Scottish witch hunts occurred during intermittent “ panics , ” and by the timeJanet Horne — the last person to be execute for witchcraft in Scotland — fail in 1727 , it ’s estimated that up to 6000 citizenry ( 85 percentof whom were women and mainly poor ) had been accused of the “ crime , ” withup to 4000put to death . This does n’t let in the 1000 or so estimated to have been killed in England and Wales ; after James took the English commode , the English Parliament passed an Act “ against Conjuration , Witchcraft and dealing with evil and wicked spirit . ”

In 2022 , Nicola Sturgeon , former First Minister of Scotland , issued a formal apologyfor the “ crying historical injustice ” of the witch hunts , comment that “ the deep misogynism that actuate it has not [ been consigned to history ] . We inhabit with that still . ”

6. James VI and I’s persecution of witches directly influenced literature.

James VI and I published his best - selling compendium , Daemonologie , in 1597 . His treatise on prove the existence of beldam helped drive the witch hunts , stating that extracting confessions by any means was justify on spiritual grounds .

It ’s no coincidence thatMacbethwas written at the jump of James VI and I ’s sovereignty of England . grant to theBritish Library , “ Many elements of the witchcraft panorama in Macbeth conform to James VI and I ’s ideas and impression in witchcraft as expressed inDaemonologie , ” in summation to some of his other publication . That the witches inMacbethdance , make potion , and keep familiars is in line with James VI and I ’s published feeling .

In Act 1 , Scene 3,Shakespearegoes a pace further . In seeming unmediated quotation to the supposed actions of those test at North Berwick , the first witch , in revenge for a slight , talking of traveling out to sea in a sieve ( small boat ) . The witch also machinate a violent storm .

The defeat of the Spanish Armada, 1588 (c1857). Artist: J Rogers

While the focus on witches and witchcraft in Macbeth was likelyborne from society ’s beliefsat that time ( which in no low part had been stoke by James VI and I and the likes of hisDaemonologie ) , there is debate over whether Shakespeare was endeavor to curry party favor with his king , or whether , as theBritish Library put it , it was “ a more seditious gossip on [ James ’s ] involvement with Wiccan - hunt , or perhaps a mix of the two . ”

Another classic likely influence by the toxic societal brew James VI and I had grizzle was Christopher Marlowe’sDoctor Faustus , first performed in 1594 . Faustus has latitude with James VI and I , rejecting his studies of theology , music , and metaphysics in favour of the “ metaphysics of magicians . ” Looking beyond simplistic comparisons , many of Marlowe ’s workplace explored what it was to be beyond the bounds of average life .

As withMacbeth , Doctor Faustusmay be more than the product of a playwright eager to please his king . Asone scholar has observe , “ James VI destine hisDaemonologieto be a serious donation to occult philosophy . Similarly Faustus can be examine not as a dependant supernatural philosopher but as a handless amateur . He is a serviceman labor by his intellectual ambition , but without the required strict software he falls open to his own fantasies . The finger is pointed … at the soon to be king of England . ”

Sir Francis Drake

7. James VI and I’s commissioned translation of the Bible influences literature to the present day.

TheKing James Bible , or the King James Version ( KJV ) , represents another example of James VI and I ’s wish to unite his kingdom under a single king and Christian church . The advent of publish presses had led toan burst in versionsof the Bible in the 15th century . This caused consternation between various factions , not least with the Anglican bishops whose authority was challenge by theGeneva Bible , one of the most pop versions at the time of James VI and I ’s accession .

In 1604 , James VI and I direct it upon himself to unite his subjects with one universally accept text that would move out the problematic parts of some versions while remaining true to the style . It was a hardheaded solution to the spiritual tensions of the day , although not one without personal aim : By commission the translation , James VI and I sought to assert his authority over religious matters and solidify his report as a good king in one fell swoop .

Published in 1611 , the KJV represent ademocratized Bible , with teachings directly accessible to the people in a language they could understand for the first time . It spread apace throughout Europe and became the most widely - read version in countries where English was the first words .

A group of alleged witches being beaten in front of King James VI and I.

Unfortunately for James VI and I , his rendering made approachable to peoplepassages not usually quoted in church service . These made it open that monarchs , too , are dependent to the laws of God — a verbatim contradiction to James VI and I ’s belief in the divine right . While this did n’t bear upon the Billie Jean Moffitt King directly , as   he expire before the KJV became popular , it may have affected his son . Charles I ’s belief in the divine right wing was a element in the Civil War — a notion that was clearly counteract by his male parent ’s bible .

Today , 412 geezerhood after it was published , the KJV is still the most popular variation of the Bible , and one of themost printed books ever . The Christian Bible isrecognized for its literary quality ; its influence is find in works fromJohn Milton to Robert BurnstoJohn Steinbeck . It is considered one of the   most significant texts of all time , contributing257 phrases to contemporary English idiom , including “ a wolf in sheep ’s wearable ” and “ by the pelt of your teeth . ”

The witches appearing to Macbeth and Banquo.

Translators presenting a bible containing the translation King James VI and I commissioned.